Skip to main content
· 6/26/1998

Burtner v. Hiram College

Citations

  • 9 F. Supp. 2d 852
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9959
  • 1998 WL 381595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that school was not deliberately indifferent by failing to act on report of harassment filed two days before graduation
  • holding that school was not deliberately indifferent by failing to act on report of harassment filed two days before graduation
  • holding there was no actual notice to Hiram until student was leaving school, which was unrelated to the appropriate person standard
  • applying the Gebser rule to a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.