· 6/26/1998
Burtner v. Hiram College
Citations
- 9 F. Supp. 2d 852
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9959
- 1998 WL 381595
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that school was not deliberately indifferent by failing to act on report of harassment filed two days before graduation
- holding that school was not deliberately indifferent by failing to act on report of harassment filed two days before graduation
- holding there was no actual notice to Hiram until student was leaving school, which was unrelated to the appropriate person standard
- applying the Gebser rule to a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.