Burthe v. Donaldson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reliance is “unreasonable as a matter of law where the alleged inference or misrepresentation is contradicted directly by another statement” or by a “specific representation in [a] document.”
• dismissing IIED claim and reasoning an app operator had no obligation to remove impersonating profiles
• rejecting plaintiff’s fraud claims because defendant “[did] not warrant that it will remove illicit content . . . [but] merely represent[ed] that it may do so”
• “‘Extreme and outrageous’ conduct is not a 8 While Defendants describe the endangerment of physical safety standard, they do not explicitly make this argument. (See MTD, Dkt. 24, at 22.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).