BURSTON, EVANS, JR. v. CARDOSO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “police need not have amassed enough evidence to justify a conviction prior to making a warrantless arrest”
• upholding a similar aiding and abetting conviction where the evidence indicated, among other things, that the defendant had arranged for drugs to be delivered by a courier to a distributor for sale in a controlled buy
• government was not required to prove actual sale by defendant in order to impose liability on aiding-and-abetting theory
• giving weight to special law enforcement training and experience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).