Burst v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it would have been improper on cross-examination for the prosecutor to have “elicit[ed] testimony regarding the nature of the convictions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-09· cited 1×
• Hayward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-20
• T.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bottoson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-12-15· cited 50×
• Cummings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-14· cited 37×
• Mosley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 36×
• Greer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-18· cited 9×
• Wilkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-14· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 6×
• Widmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 3×