Burst v. Burst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an assertion of “dictator leadership” was not defamatory because it was an opinion
• holding statement that plaintiff was “not a good accountant” is a matter of opinion
• while alleged defamatory statements made during labor or political controversies are not immunized from civil liability, they are gauged by the conventional give-and-take common to such disputes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).