Bursack v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, among others, Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 590 S.W.2d 920 (Tenn. 1979) and Wilson v. Ricciardi, 778 S.W.2d 450 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989)
• citing, among others, Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 590 S.W.2d 920 (Tenn. 1979) and Wilson v. Ricciardi, 778 S.W.2d 450 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989)
• affirming summary dismissal of a legal malpractice claim where the defendant presented an expert affidavit indicating compliance with the standard of care and the plaintiff failed to present expert testimony in response
• “An appeal is deemed frivolous if it is devoid of merit or if it has no reasonable chance of success.”
• “An appeal is deemed frivolous if it is devoid of merit or if it has no reasonable chance of success.”
• “[A]bsent allegations of obvious negligence, expert evidence is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).