Skip to main content
· 3/11/1977

Burrus v. Itek Corp.

Citations

  • 360 N.E.2d 1168
  • 46 Ill. App. 3d 350
  • 4 Ill. Dec. 793
  • 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1009
  • 1977 Ill. App. LEXIS 2227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • there is no requirement that a witness with experience and knowledge as to the value of printing presses be qualified as an expert
  • consequential damages incurred where defective printing press caused decrease in output

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.