Burrows v. Kinsley
Citations
- 27 Wash. 694
- 68 P. 332
- 1902 Wash. LEXIS 442
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL-EXCEPTIONS TO FINDINGS-SPECIFICATION.</p> <p>Exceptions to findings of fact and conclusions of law by reference thereto by number are sufficient.</p> <p>SAME-TIME FOB TAKING.</p> <p>The fact that findings of fact and conclusions of law were signed by the court on one day and exceptions thereto noted on the day following would not invalidate such exceptions, under Bal. Code, § 5052, which provides that exceptions may be taken by a party’s stating to the judge when the decision is made that he excepts to the same, specifying the part or parts excepted to, where the decision was not signed by the judge until the day following his signature to the findings and conclusions, and there is nothing in the record showing that the exceptions were not stated to the judge and allowed before the decision became a matter of record.</p> <p>PABOL EVIDENCE-PBOCEEDINGS OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEBS.</p> <p>Oral evidence is admissible for the purpose of showing proceedings of a board of county commissioners which have not been noted on its records.</p> <p>HIGHWAYS-ESTABLISHMENT AND VACATION.</p> <p>An order of the county commissioners establishing a road upon a petition asking for such road and the vacation of part of an old road would not operate as a vacation of the road asked for, in the absence of an express order of the hoard, when the road established did not lie within the termini of the old road.</p>
Judges: Hadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.