Burrows v. French
Citations
- 34 S.C. 165
- 13 S.E. 355
- 1891 S.C. LEXIS 37
Syllabus
<p>1. Limitation op Actions — Non-Residents.—A promissory note was made in another State between parties there resident. Afterwards the maker removed to this State and the payee, still a non-resident, brought his action in the courts of this State against the maker more than ton years after the Hast credit on the note, but within six years after defendant's removal into this State. Held, that the action was not barred, as the saving of the statute as to persons who “return” to the State includes such persons as come into the State without a previous residence here.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Act allowed for ample opportunity for inspection by a defense expert
- holding that Adam Walsh Act does not prohibit inspection by defense expert
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McIver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.