· 9/11/1984
Burrows v. Chemed Corp.
Citations
- 743 F.2d 612
- 35 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1410
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18716
- 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- basing its conclusion that competition had been displaced in part on the defeat in the state legislature of numerous attempts to deregulate
- basing its conclusion that competition had been displaced in part on the defeat in the state legislature of numerous attempts to deregulate
- finding anticompetitive conduct a foreseeable result of the creation of a utility
- finding anticompetitive conduct a foreseeable result of the creation of a utility
- statutory authorization for utility to price below cost and “do all things necessary” to exercise its powers contemplated anticompetitive conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.