Burrow v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[c]ourts that have addressed the question of whether a complaint can be dismissed after it survives § 1915A screening have, almost invariably, answered yes” and reasoning that “under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2
• explaining that under § 1915(e)(2), “there is no persuasive reason why a § 1915A screening should foreclose a post- screening dismissal of a complaint”
• finding “no persuasive reason why a § 1915A screening should foreclose a post-screening dismissal of a complaint upon briefing by the parties represented by counsel”
• noting allegations of bad faith in the handling of exculpatory evidence alone does not equate to a bad faith handling of the proceedings as a whole
• “Courts that have addressed the question of whether a complaint can be dismissed after it survives § 1915A screening have, almost invariably, answered yes.”
• “That the complaint may have survived an initial look by the judge, ought not be and is not dispositive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).