Skip to main content
· 12/9/2002

Burroughs v. Worsham

Citations

  • 574 S.E.2d 215
  • 352 S.C. 382
  • 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an internist, a colorectal surgeon, and an Illinois-licensed family practitioner qualified to testify to the standard of care for a South Carolina family practitioner
  • claims for personal injury and loss of consortium are separate and distinct, not derivative of each other, and each litigant is entitled to a verdict based on the law and the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hearn, Cureton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.