Skip to main content
· 3/30/1984

Burroughs Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

Citations

  • 153 Cal. App. 3d 1152
  • 200 Cal. Rptr. 816
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, in applying the primary purpose test to a sale for resale exemption claim, the decisive factor is “whether a substantial intervening use of the property has occurred at any time which is primarily undertaken for a purpose other than its subsequent resale.”
  • statutory language, use “does not include the sale of . . . property in the regular course of business,” constitutes a resale exemption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sparks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.