Skip to main content
· 9/27/1990

Burris v. Cross

Citations

  • 583 A.2d 1364
  • 1990 Del. Super. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the defendant was a willing litigant because it was actively pursuing a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery
  • noting that overripeness is the opposition to a “typical declaratory judgment action, [where] an unwilling litigant will have cast a cloud upon a property right (or other legal interest) of the declaratory plaintiff, but will not have moved forward to litigate the claim.”
  • dismissing a case in Superior where the action in the Court of Chancery “appears to be not only ‘equally serviceable,’ but indeed superior to the remedy available in this Court.”
  • in deciding whether to entertain a request for declaratory judgment under 10 Del. C., § 6501, ef seg., the court noted its concerns for practicality and judicial economy
  • “[n]ormally actions to determine title to land are actions at law”
  • declaratory judgment action dismissed where same issue pending in Chancery Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.