· 2/27/1922

Burrill v. Locomobile Co.

Citations

  • 258 U.S. 34
  • 42 S. Ct. 256
  • 66 L. Ed. 450
  • 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2235

Syllabus

<p>1. Massachusetts Statutes 1909, c. 490, Part III, §§ 70 and 71, provides, as the exclusive remedy for recovering a tax illegally exacted under the act, a petition to the Supreme Judicial Court and prompt repayment by the State of the sum there adjudged, .and relieves the collector from liability-to personal action.' P. 37.</p> <p>2. The time fixed for filing the petition — six months — is reasonable. P. 37. .</p> <p>3. In the absence óf a controlling act of Congress, the right of a foreign corporation to recover taxes exacted under an unconstitu- ■ tional state statute may be confined by the state law- to the direct responsibility of the State-and the collector of the. taxes be thereby relieved of personal liability, even when sued in the federal court, at least where the remedy afforded is adequate. P. 37.</p> <p>4. Quaere: Whether the proceeding, given by the Massachusetts statute, supra, could be instituted in the Federal District Court? P. 39.</p> <p>5. The Constitution, standing alone, does not create a paramount, unchangeable liability to an action of tort’ on- the part of all persons who may take part in enforcing a state law that it invalidates, but leaves the remedies to Congress and the States. P.38..</p>

Judges: Holmes, Pitney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.