Skip to main content
· 9/25/1970

Burrell v. Southern Pacific Company

Citations

  • 474 P.2d 466
  • 13 Ariz. App. 107
  • 1970 Ariz. App. LEXIS 759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that res judicata did not preclude the subsequent filing of an action which was a permissive claim in a prior action
  • holding that res judicata did not preclude the subsequent filing of an action which was a permissive claim in a prior action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marks, Hathaway, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.