Skip to main content
· 11/3/1983

Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. Ozment

Citations

  • 440 So. 2d 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although claimant who is PTD has a right to be accepted as PTD, the fact that E/C continues to pay TTD benefits during the pendency of investigation is relevant to the issue of whether the E/C acted reasonably in continuing to investigate a PTD claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.