Burnstein v. Saks Fifth Avenue & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that one alleged FCBA violation for filing a collection action was time-barred but another alleged violation was not; “another collection effort was commenced in the fall of 2000, …. A claim arising from this alleged violation would not be time-barred.
• obligor drafted letter to creditor regarding problem of “double billing” related to use of her maiden name on certain account
• defendant contended “its duties never arose, in light of [p]laintiff s purported failure to trigger [defendant’s] statutory responsibilities by giving adequate notice of any alleged billing errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).