Skip to main content

Burns v. State

Citations

  • 110 So. 3d 96
  • 2013 WL 950740
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the appellant’s motion was facially insufficient where the appellant did not demonstrate “when or how he discovered the evidence or why it could not have been discovered sooner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crenshaw, Larose, Villanti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.