District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/13/2013
Burns v. State
Citations
- 110 So. 3d 96
- 2013 WL 950740
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the appellant’s motion was facially insufficient where the appellant did not demonstrate “when or how he discovered the evidence or why it could not have been discovered sooner.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crenshaw, Larose, Villanti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.