Skip to main content
· 7/25/1991

Burns v. Kabboul

Citations

  • 595 A.2d 1153
  • 407 Pa. Super. 289
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]t will weigh heavily against the proponent on the issue of undue influence when the proponent was either the scrivener of the will or was present at the dictation of the will.”
  • finding evidence sufficient to establish weakened intellect where parties produced competing medical testimony on question of whether testator had suffered from Alzheimer’s Disease in the final years of his life
  • deciding both -7- J-A14025-20 types of claims under different standards
  • deciding both types of claims under different standards
  • “It is well-settled that a prior will containing the same testamentary disposition is strong evidence against undue influence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Kelly, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.