Skip to main content
· 1/22/1998

Burns v. Consolidated Amusement Co.

Citations

  • 182 F.R.D. 609
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18667
  • 1998 WL 817846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the law does not permit an employee's subjective perceptions to underlie a claim of constructive discharge because to do otherwise would be to enable an employee to base such a claim on unreasonable sensitivity to his work environs
  • recognizing that the law does not permit an employee’s subjective perceptions to underlie a claim of constructive discharge because to do otherwise would be to enable an employee to base such a claim on unreasonable sensitivity to his work environs
  • personal responsibility component of Poulis test met where party was aware of counsel's prior inability to comply with court rules
  • personal responsibility component of Poulis test met where party was aware of counsel’s prior inability to comply with court rules
  • a plaintiff must prove “deliberateness of the employer’s action, and intolerability of the working conditions” to prove constructive discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.