Skip to main content
· 11/23/2018

Burns v. City of Tucson

Citations

  • 432 P.3d 953
  • 245 Ariz. 594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing examples of the notices HUD published extending the provisions of Notice 95-12
  • “the effect of the repudiation of the pricing mechanism in the HAP contracts was to deprive the overall limitation of any continuing vitality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brearcliffe, Eckerstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.