Skip to main content
· 2/17/1993

Burns v. Board of Nursing

Citations

  • 495 N.W.2d 698
  • 1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 37
  • 1993 WL 38034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing district court’s award' of attorney fees because petitioner was not prevailing party under appellate review
  • reversing district court's award of attorney fees because petitioner was not prevailing party under appellate review
  • “Because review is not de novo, the court must not reassess the weight to be accorded various items of evidence.”
  • “The administrative process presupposes judgment calls are to be left to the agency.”
  • “Fee awards, under the statute, can be awarded only to the prevailing party. Because Burns does not prevail under our review, the award must be set aside.”
  • “Because review is not de novo, the court must not reassess the weight to be accorded various items of evidence. Weight of evidence remains within the agency’s exclusive domain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Schultz, Carter, Layorato, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.