Skip to main content
· 6/27/1914

Burnley v. Shinn

Citations

  • 80 Wash. 240
  • 141 P. 326
  • 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1279

Syllabus

<p>Sales—Rescission—By Purchaser. There can be no rescission by the purchaser of an automobile, seeking to recover the purchase price because of fraud in the sale, where it was badly damaged while in his possession, so that the parties cannot be placed in statu quo.</p> <p>Sales—Warranty—Damages—Measure. There can be no recovery of damages'for breach of warranty of an automobile, in the absence of evidence showing either its market or reasonable value.</p>

Judges: Main

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.