Burnison v. Memorial Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he undisputed facts show that on-call time is spent primarily for the plaintiffs’ benefit and therefore . . . the Hospital is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs’ claims for on-call compensation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).