Burnice Stackhouse v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n the absence of exceptional circumstances, we will not entertain a claim that was not raised before the agency.”
• “[I]n the absence 18 of exceptional circumstances, we will not entertain a claim that was not raised before the agency.”
• “[I]n the absence of exceptional circumstances, we will not entertain a claim that was not raised before the agency.”
• “[W]hen interpreting [a] local statute, this court will look to federal cases interpreting [a] nearly identical federal statute.”; “We find the [federal Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board’s] interpretation of [FECA] persuasive.”
• upholding CRB’s reasonable resolution of conflicting considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).