Burnham v. State
Citations
- 37 Fla. 327
Syllabus
<p>An information under our statute (section 2419 Revised Statutes) prescribing a penalty against “whoever speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously, imputing to her a want of chastity,” should not only set out the words constituting the oral slander, but should also charge that they were uttered or spoken in .the presence of some one; and the better practice would be to set out the names, or some of them of the persons before whom they were uttered or spoken.</p>
Judges: Liddon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Buckner v. Lower Florida Keys Hosp. Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-11· cited 63×
- Fiore v. RogeroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-08-31· cited 21×
- Stutts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 5×
- Advantage Personnel Agency, Inc. v. Hicks & Grayson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-28· cited 5×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.