Burnette v. Northside Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “employees are not entitled to on-call pay under the FLSA absent unusually onerous on-call duties.”
• “[A] court should not act as ‘a super-personnel department’ by second-guessing an employer’s business judgment about where it assigns its employees.”
• protected activity does not require a specific FLSA reference so long as the activity or complaint concerns an employer’s wage or hour practices
• “That Burnette likely would incur additional vehicle maintenance ... does not affect the conclusion that the reassignment was not an adverse employment action.”
• “Failure to respond to the opposing party’s summary judgment arguments regarding a claim constitutes an abandonment of that claim and warrants the entry of summary judgment for the opposing party.”
• “Failure to respond to the opposing party’s summary judgment arguments regarding a claim constitutes an abandonment of that claim and warrants the entry of summary judgment for the opposing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).