Burnett v. Government Employee Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff’s allegations met Rule 9(b)’s standard where “[the plaintiff] ple[aded] the date, time, and place of Appellees’ conduct and provided a detailed description of that conduct.”
• predicting that the “New Jersey Supreme Court would apply the CFA to [the plaintiff’s] claim, where an insurance company is alleged to have fraudulently performed a contract with a consumer.”
• stating that on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6
• declining to consider allegations raised at the II. Legal Standard A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6
• requiring “sufficient particularity to place the defendant on notice of the precise misconduct with which it is charged.” (cleaned up)
• applying NJCFA to insured’s claim that defendant had represented that insured had to sign a document to facilitate approval of claims, but the document was a waiver of claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).