Skip to main content
· 2/23/1932

Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.

Citations

  • 285 U.S. 1
  • 52 S. Ct. 275
  • 76 L. Ed. 587
  • 1932 U.S. LEXIS 424
  • 1932 C.B. 286
  • 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 800
  • 3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he primary design of the [foreign tax credit] provision was to mitigate the evil of double taxation.\
  • “[T]he primary design of [the foreign-tax credit] was to mitigate the evil of double taxation.”
  • “The Court is not bound by an administrative construction, and if that construction is not uniform and consistent, it will be taken into account only to the extent that it is sup- ported by valid reasons”
  • “[t]he word ‘country,’ in the expression ‘foreign country’ is ambiguous”
  • “[t]he word ‘country,’ in the expression ‘foreign country’ is ambiguous”
  • political subdivisions’ income taxes subject to credit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hughes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.