Skip to main content
· 10/11/2013

Burnashov v. F/V Oceanview, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 978 F. Supp. 2d 77
  • 2013 WL 5607179
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the dispute over 3 an interrogatory was largely moot where responding party’s supplemental response stated that 4 they did not withhold any information on the basis of their relevancy objection
  • a mere statement by a party that an inWteurrroligtzaetor ryC oi.s (“Hovoellryl y Sbprroinagds, bDuivridsieonns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.