· 10/11/2013
Burnashov v. F/V Oceanview, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 978 F. Supp. 2d 77
- 2013 WL 5607179
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the dispute over 3 an interrogatory was largely moot where responding party’s supplemental response stated that 4 they did not withhold any information on the basis of their relevancy objection
- a mere statement by a party that an inWteurrroligtzaetor ryC oi.s (“Hovoellryl y Sbprroinagds, bDuivridsieonns
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.