· 11/7/1936
Burnap v. Burnap
Citations
- 144 Kan. 568
- 61 P.2d 899
- 1936 Kan. LEXIS 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the heightened procedural protections of the ICWA and the MIFPA apply when a child is an “Indian child”
- stating that the heightened procedural protections of the ICWA and the MIFPA only apply when a child is an “Indian child”
- applying the clear-and-convincing standard under ICWA when analyzing the statutory grounds for termination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.