Skip to main content
· 11/7/1936

Burnap v. Burnap

Citations

  • 144 Kan. 568
  • 61 P.2d 899
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the heightened procedural protections of the ICWA and the MIFPA apply when a child is an “Indian child”
  • stating that the heightened procedural protections of the ICWA and the MIFPA only apply when a child is an “Indian child”
  • applying the clear-and-convincing standard under ICWA when analyzing the statutory grounds for termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.