Burnand v. Irigoyen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A contract relating to ... personal property not in his immediate possession or control, entered into by a minor under 18 years is void and requires no act of disaffirmance.”
• “One deals with infants at his peril.... The policy of the law is to discourage adults from contracting with an infant and they cannot eom-plain if as a consequence of violating the rule they are injured by the exercise of the right of disaffirmance vested in the infant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).