Burmood v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a careful response to a jury’s request for specific pieces of evidence can keep the jury from overvaluing any one piece of evidence
• noting that government there contended it was “the judge’s special business to guide the jury by appropriate legal criteria through the maze of facts before it”
• reversing and remanding because a \supplemental instruction\ from the trial court following a question by the jury was \simply wrong\
• reversing and remanding because a \supplemental instruction\ from the .trial court following a question by the jury was “simply wrong”
• reversing and remanding because a \supplemental instruction\ from the trial court following a question by the jury was \simply wrong\
• reversing and remanding because a \supplemental instruction” from the trial court following a question by the jury was \simply wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).