Skip to main content
· 12/28/2010

Burlington v. NEWS CORPORATION

Citations

  • 759 F. Supp. 2d 580
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136892
  • 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 226
  • 2010 WL 5341843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Renda’s inability to explain why Burlington had been suspended for repeating what he had said in the meeting while an African American employee had not been disciplined for similar conduct
  • it is “redundant” to rehash a plaintiff’s evidence of pretext under the mixed motive analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: R. Barclay Surrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.