Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that continuing temporary nuisances \give[ ] rise over and over to new causes of action\ until they are abated (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted)
• stating that a showing of serious endangerment “does not necessitate quantification of endangerment”
• noting that a spoliation sanction may be proper where a “party has a duty to preserve evidence because it knew, or should have known, that litigation was imminent”
• stating that a showing of serious endangerment “does not necessitate 8 quantification of endangerment”
• refusing to address argument because party “failed to provide arguments or authorities in support of’ its position
• permitting alternative pleading of unjust enrichment under Oklahoma law, so long as plaintiff does not obtain double recovery for the same injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).