Skip to main content
· 6/12/1992

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Ford

Citations

  • 504 U.S. 648
  • 112 S. Ct. 2184
  • 119 L. Ed. 2d 432
  • 1992 U.S. LEXIS 3541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that equal protection clause is violated if the under-inclusiveness and over-inclusiveness is so great that the rules can no longer be said rationally to implement the policy judgment
  • recognizing that equal protection clause is violated if the under-inclusiveness and over-inclusiveness is so great that the rules can no longer be said rationally to implement the policy judgment
  • holding classification based on religion is suspect classification
  • referring to “race” and “religion” as “classif[ications] along suspect lines”
  • describing race or religion as suspect classes
  • describing “race or religion” as suspect classes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.