BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CORP. v. Dakota Missouri Valley and Western Railroad, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to strike related to motion for summary judgment and noting that “[c]ourts have consistently held that the various papers submitted in support of or in opposition to summary judgment motions are not pleadings as contemplated by Rule 12(f)”
• “Courts have consistently held that the various paper submitted in support of or in opposition to summary judgment motions are not pleadings as contemplated by Rule 12(f)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).