Burlington County College Faculty Ass'n v. Board of Trustees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that formulation of college calendar fixing length and division of college year was managerial prerogative and not proper subject of mandatory negotiation
• holding that setting of college calendar implicated academic freedom and was therefore outside scope of Act
• holding that \the college calendar is not a proper subject of mandatory negotiation and that the lower court's holding to the contrary was erroneous\
• noting that “days and hours of work by individual faculty members . . . are mandatorily negotiable under the [Employer- Employee Relations Act]”
• noting that “days and hours of work by individual faculty members ... are mandatorily negotiable under the [Employer-Employee Relations Act]”
• board properly negotiated faculty's working terms and conditions, such as compensation, hours, work load, sick leaves, personal and sabbatical leaves, physical accommodations, and grievance procedures; no legal duty to negotiate college calendar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).