Burling v. Thompkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, notwithstanding OCGA § 5-6-34 (d
• rule set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (d) does not apply where the earlier judgment, ruling or order was in a separate. and distinct proceeding
• a matter does not become moot if adverse collateral consequences continue to plague the affected party
• appellants’ challenge to the juvenile court’s deprivation order was moot because they had regained custody of the child
• When parents do not 7 “A court may take judicial notice of records in the same court.” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.
• a party taking a timely appeal from an order in a deprivation proceeding could challenge an earlier, unappealed deprivation order by virtue of OCGA § 5-6-34 (d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).