First Circuit· 6/8/1995
Burks, Jr. v. Duboise
Citations
- 55 F.3d 712
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14241
- 1995 WL 331800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing de novo question of whether state court's __ limited review of petitioner's claim for miscarriage of justice effected a waiver
- “If inadvertence of counsel, without more, were deemed to constitute sufficient cause, the cause requirement would be reduced to little more than a speed bump on the road to a federal forum”
- failure to object to prosecutor's misstatement of evidence at closing precludes habeas review
- procedural requirement must be “consistently applied” to bar habeas review
- setting forth standard for procedurally barred claims
- “[P]etitioner's recreation of what transpired in the state trial court shows, at most, that there was a legitimate jury question as to his guilt, and that the prosecutor placed her thumb on the scales of justice at one point. This is not enough to qualify for extraordinary relief. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Cyr, Boudin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BarrettFirst Circuit· 1999-05-27· cited 264×
- Horton v. AllenFirst Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 209×
- McCambridge v. HallFirst Circuit· 2002-08-27· cited 186×
- Fortini v. MurphyFirst Circuit· 2001-07-27· cited 150×
- Janosky v. St. AmandFirst Circuit· 2010-02-03· cited 138×
- Bucci v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2011-10-13· cited 99×
- Derman v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2002-07-25· cited 91×
- Simpson v. MatesanzFirst Circuit· 1999-05-10· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-08-20· cited 88×
- Brewer v. Marshall, SheriffFirst Circuit· 1997-07-21· cited 74×
- Lee v. CorsiniFirst Circuit· 2015-01-26· cited 42×
- Phoenix v. MatesanzFirst Circuit· 1999-08-19· cited 41×
- Levasseur v. PepeFirst Circuit· 1995-11-22· cited 38×
- Diamen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-02-25· cited 22×
- Walker v. RussoFirst Circuit· 2007-10-19· cited 15×
- Moore, Jr. v. PonteFirst Circuit· 1999-08-02· cited 14×
- Barbosa v. MitchellFirst Circuit· 2016-01-28· cited 13×
- John M. McCambridge v. Timothy Hall, SuperintendentFirst Circuit· 2001-09-24· cited 12×
- United States v. PollardDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-07· cited 12×
- Muller v. GoguenDistrict of Columbia· 2019-06-25· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 7,499×
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,060×
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 3,033×
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,925×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Nazzaro Scarpa v. Larry E. Dubois, Etc.First Circuit· 1994-10-18· cited 374×
- Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc.First Circuit· 1987-10-09· cited 144×
- Wesley P. Tart v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsFirst Circuit· 1991-11-15· cited 109×
- Commonwealth v. FlukerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-01-18· cited 77×
- Ortiz v. DuboisFirst Circuit· 1994-03-28· cited 65×
- Gardner v. ScottSupreme Court· 1995-01-09· cited 51×
- Theodis Watkins v. Joseph PonteFirst Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 26×
- Thomas A. Magee v. Scott HarshbargerFirst Circuit· 1994-02-24· cited 18×
Other cases named Burks, Jr. v. Duboise
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.