Burkhart v. Wolf Motors of Naperville, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the correct standard to apply to juvenile cases remains unclear and noting that the United States Supreme Court has avoided answering the question
• noting that a plaintiff states a plausible claim for relief if he includes \enough details about the subject matter of the case to present a story that holds together\
• allowing for defendants to assert a qualified immunity defense at the pleading stage, though noting at this stage the defense is subject to a more challenging review
• reversing grant of qualified immunity asserted on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) where available record lacked information about the reasons that defendants isolated the plaintiffs
• discussing circuit split and noting that the Supreme Court has not decided this question
• if a plaintiff fails to show that the official violated a constitutional right, the defendant official is protected by qualified immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).