Burkhardt v. Georgia School Township
Citations
- 9 S.D. 315
- 69 N.W. 16
- 1896 S.D. LEXIS 169
Syllabus
<p>1. Where a school board, having power to change the location of schoolhouses only when authorized to do so by the voters of the district (Laws 1891, Chap. 56, Sube. 5, Secs. 1, 5), contracts for the removal of a school house, it will be presumed in the absence of a contrary showing, that the board was so authorized.</p> <p>2. An injunction restraining' a person from performing a contract with a school board for the removal of a school house will excuse such person from performing his contract, in the absence of a showing that the injunction was dissolved within such time as made it necessary for him to resume work.</p>
Judges: Haney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Karras v. GannonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 21×
- South Memphis Land Co. v. McLean Hardwood Lumber Co.Sixth Circuit· 1910-06-07· cited 17×
- Kuhl v. School District No. 76 of Wayne CountyNebraska Supreme Court· 1952-02-15· cited 9×
- Redfield School District No. 12 v. Redfield Independent School District No. 20South Dakota Supreme Court· 1901-02-12· cited 3×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.