Burkes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Rule 3.220(j)J is violated when the State or the defense withholds ‘additional witnesses or material’, that, if , discovered earlier, would have been subject to mandatory disclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McFadden
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-10-07· cited 7×
• Guillen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-13· cited 4×
• Daniel Scott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-17· cited 1×
• State v. Fernandez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-21· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• Scipio v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-16· cited 86×
• Olson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-30· cited 12×
• Sharif v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-01· cited 3×
• Orange County Fire Rescue v. Antonelli
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-15· cited 1×