Skip to main content
· 3/30/2004

Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. II

Citations

  • 87 P.3d 81
  • 207 Ariz. 393
  • 422 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
  • 2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a non-waiver clause should be upheld based on its plain language and that to hold otherwise would render the clause meaningless, in addition to violating the intention of the contract among the property owners
  • noting that unambiguous covenants are generally enforced according to their terms
  • trial court erred by balancing hardships where party built structure knowing of restrictions and neighborhood opposition to structure
  • “When cross-motions for summary judgment have been filed, this court may evaluate the cross- motions and, if appropriate, remand with instructions that judgment be entered in favor of the appellants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gemmill, Hall, Winthrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.