· 7/23/1930
Burke v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Citations
- 42 F.2d 742
- 1930 A.M.C. 1830
- 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In principle, we agree that nothing in the development code precludes the city from, in effect, postponing a showing of compliance with specific development criteria until the final plat approval, provided there is a showing that compliance is feasible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.