Burke v. Public Welfare Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agency action which explains what is necessarily required by existing regulations need not be promulgated
• “There is no reason to require the formalities of rulemaking whenever an agency undertakes to explain the necessary requirements of an existing rule.”
• “[A]n agency’s pronouncement of how a validly promulgated rule operates in a specific context need not itself be promulgated as a rule if the existing rule necessarily requires the result set forth in that pronouncement.”
• “[A]n agency’s pronouncement of how a validly promulgated rule operates in a specific context need not itself be promul- gated as a rule if the existing rule necessarily requires the result set forth in that pronouncement.”
• “[A]n agency’s pronouncement of how a validly promulgated rule operates in a specific context need not itself be promul- gated as a rule if the existing rule necessarily requires the result set forth in that pronouncement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).