Skip to main content
· 3/21/1980

Burke v. New York State Board

Citations

  • 103 Misc. 2d 615
  • 426 N.Y.S.2d 429
  • 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • as matter of law, counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to make meritless motion, objection, or argument
  • conclusory assertions unsupported by coherent analytical argument fail to satisfy requirement that party asserting alleged error must both specifically assign and specifically argue it in party’s initial brief
  • when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
  • when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
  • when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
  • when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward, Gorman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.