· 3/21/1980
Burke v. New York State Board
Citations
- 103 Misc. 2d 615
- 426 N.Y.S.2d 429
- 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- as matter of law, counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to make meritless motion, objection, or argument
- conclusory assertions unsupported by coherent analytical argument fail to satisfy requirement that party asserting alleged error must both specifically assign and specifically argue it in party’s initial brief
- when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
- when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
- when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
- when sentences imposed within statutory limits are alleged to be excessive, appellate court must determine whether sentencing court abused its discretion in considering well-established factors and applicable legal principles
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edward, Gorman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.