Skip to main content
· 12/15/1982

Burke v. Farrell

Citations

  • 656 P.2d 1015
  • 1982 Utah LEXIS 1135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is no affirmative duty to disclose information as to value of the partnership by a partner who bought the interest of the managing partner who kept partnership records
  • although selling partner did not disclose value of partnership interest, no breach of fiduciary duty where acquiring partner had \ample access to information about the value of his partnership interest\ and had \ready access to the records of the partnership\
  • although selling partner did not disclose value of partnership interest, there was no breach of fiduciary duty where acquiring partner had “ample access to information about the value of his partnership interest” and had “ready access to the records of the partnership”
  • although selling partner did not disclose value of partnership interest, no breach of fiduciary duty where acquiring partner had “ample access to information about the value of his partnership interest” and had “ready access to the records of the partnership”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.