Burke v. Donington, Karcher, Salmond, Ronan & Rainone, P.A. (In Re Donington, Karcher, Salmond, Ronan & Rainone, P.A.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding to be non-core, garden variety prepetition contract, tort and malpractice claims that only peripherally involve the debtor
• agreeing with “[t]he majority of courts [that] have upheld the applicability of Bankruptcy Rule 9027 to Section 1452 and enforced a ninety day time limitation”
• finding proceeding to be non-core because the state contract and tort claims involved “pre-petition conduct, relate only peripherally to the bankruptcy itself, and involve no substantive right in bankruptcy”
• “ ‘subsection (0) does not render a proceeding core merely because the resolution of the action results in more, or less, assets in the estate.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).